Legal Opinion
King County v. Seawest Investment Associates, LLC
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 22, 2007No. 59333-1-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
¶1 Seawest Investment Associates, LLC, claims the trial court was without authority to adjudicate in a proceeding ancillary to this action the validity and amount of the attorney lien filed in this matter by the law firm of Graham & Dunn. We hold that the trial court properly exercised its discretion to ensure that all necessary persons participated in the lien enforcement proceeding and that all were afforded due process. Accordingly, we affirm.
¶2 Seawest hired Graham & Dunn to represent it in this eminent domain proceeding brought by King County as the *308matter approached trial. Two other law…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Havens v. C & D PLASTICS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- West v. Port of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. AlsagerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- West v. Port of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Jeanne Hawkins And Julie Wilson v. Empres Healthcare Mgmt, Llc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Smith v. MORAN, WINDES & WONG, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.