Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hatfield v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1960No. 6147PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By SKEEL, J.:

This is an action in mandamus invoking the original jurisdiction of the court. The relator’s petition sets out by name the members of the Industrial Commission and also those alleged to constitute the Columbus Regional Board of Review and further says that James L. Young is the Administrator of the Bureau, all of whom are charged with administering the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Ohio.

It is further alleged that the Westinghouse Electric Corporation at its Columbus, Ohio Plant (authorized to do business in Ohio) is amenable to the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Ohio and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re KurtzhalzOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Industrial Commission v. HogleOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State Ex Rel. Crabb v. OlingerWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State v. Industrial Commission of Ohio.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Potomac Abatement, Inc. v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. PRESSMAN, ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF HARRIS v. Accident FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Gang v. Montgomery Cnty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  4. Peters v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Peters v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API