Peters v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentRiley, J.
These two cases were consolidated to enable this Court to decide the appropriate legal standard to apply in workers’ compensation cases involving claims of psychiatric disabilities arising "out of and in the course of’ one’s employment. This my colleagues have not done. Rather, the majority has stated that because the Legislature has amended the relevant statute effective January 1, 1982, they need not reexamine this Court’s interpretation of the earlier statute in Deziel v Difco Laboratories, Inc (After Remand), 403 Mich 1; 268 NW2d 1 (1978).
This rationale completely disregards the fact that…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Sheppard v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Carter v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Selk v. Detroit Plastic ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.