Legal Opinion

In Re Kurtzhalz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1943No. 29442PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

The complaint, of the petitioner is that the order of commitment entered by the Court of Common Pleas is invalid for the reason that that court was at that time wholly without jurisdiction to enter any order whatsoever in that case. Is this contention correct? The Court of Appeals held to the contrary.

Although the instant case originated in the Court of Appeals and is an action for a writ of habeas corpus, the background of the controversy lies in a different action that was filed previously in the Court of Common Pleas. The petitioner in the instant case is the defendant in that action in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. Schooner ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1843

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Special Prosecutors v. JudgesOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Howard v. Catholic Social Services of Cuyahoga County, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Yee v. Erie County Sheriff's DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1990

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API