Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1943No. 29118PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is the contention of respondent that relatrix is not entitled to a peremptory writ of mandamus for the reason that her decedent died more than eight years after the date of his injury. While the fact of the death of claimant's decedent more than eight years after the date of his compensable injury would have been ground for rejection of the claim by the commission or on appeal, such question is not before us at this time.

It is alleged in the petition and admitted in the answer that the Court of Common Pleas on appeal found that the claimant had a right to participate in the state insurance…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conold v. SternOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. B.O.C. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Auto Loan Co. v. JenningsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API