Legal Opinion
Romano v. Wilbur Ellis & Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 3, 1947No. Civ. 13440PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued in tort arising from the alleged representations of defendants which induced a third party to repudiate its contract with plaintiff. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend, a timely request for leave to amend was denied, and judgment was entered for defendants.
1. Does the complaint state a cause of action ? It is alleged that in 1941 a Peruvian corporation named “Industrial Pesquera, S.A.” executed a written contract with plaintiff and one Reed, copartners, for the exclusive right for the period of 10 years to sell its fish and fish products. In June…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Elsbach v. MulliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Remillard-Dandini Co. v. DandiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- H. G. Fenton Material Co. v. ChalletCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
- Diodes, Inc. v. FranzenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Dryden v. Tri-Valley GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Clark Equipment Co. v. WheatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Freed v. Manchester Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.