Remillard-Dandini Co. v. Dandini
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
NOUBSE, P. J.-
The plaintiff sued for damages for interference with its business. Before a ruling was had on the defendants’ demurrer it was stricken from the files and they filed their answer. They thereafter made a motion for judgment on the pleadings which was granted upon the sole ground that the complaint did not state a cause of action. The appeal is taken on the judgment roll and presents the single question whether a cause of action in tort is stated where plaintiff sues for the defendants’ “intentional interference with contractual rights and relationships of plaintiff. ’ ’ Before…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- California Grape Control Board., Ltd. v. California Produce Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
- Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Elsbach v. MulliganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Guillory v. GodfreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Freed v. Manchester Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.