Legal Opinion
Dryden v. Tri-Valley Growers
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 18, 1977No. Civ. 39050PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
Plaintiffs, James Diyden, individually, and with Paul R. Minasian and Malcolm R. Minasian acting as a partnership of Dryden, Minasian & Minasian, appeal from the trial court’s judgment dismissing the action against respondent Tri-Valley Growers after the demurrer to the third, fourth, fifth and sixth causes of action of the first amended complaint (complaint) was sustained without leave to amend.
The background facts appearing in the complaint reveal that commencing in 1970 appellants entered into a series of contracts with Henry and Margaret Irving (Irvings), the owners of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Doremus v. HennessyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- 999, a Corporation, Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. C.I.T. Corporation, a Corporation, Defendant/appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Kruse v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.