Simonini v. Jay Dee Leather Products Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
The principal question involved in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing a personal injury action on the ground that plaintiff, in failing to bring the matter to trial within two years after action filed, did not exercise due diligence.
The history of the case follows: The complaint was filed June 10,1944. A demurrer thereafter filed was overruled, and on September 7 the answer of defendant was filed. Pursuant to memorandum of motion to set, the cause was set for trial by jury for November 21. Thereafter the trial was continued three times, the last time…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Raggio v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Grigsby v. Napa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Inderbitzen v. Lane HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Hecq v. ConnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. LaufferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Black Bros. Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Bonelli v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Breckenridge v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Knight v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Market-Front Co. v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.