Legal Opinion

Raggio v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1919No. Sac. No. 2753PublishedCited by 44 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, and from an order dismissing an action. W. A. Anderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing his action on the ground that he had not used due diligence in its prosecution, and also from a judgment of dismissal based on such order.

The action was one to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as the result of negligence of the defendants. It was instituted September 12, 1912. Demurrers were interposed by both defendants. These demurrers were argued and submitted for decision to the superior court of Yolo County on December 9, 1912, Honorable N. A. Hawkins, then judge of said court, presiding. On the first Monday…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gray v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  2. Ferris v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Witter v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Mowry v. WeisenbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Kubli v. HawkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Weeks v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Chavez v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Shotkin v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  4. Steen v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Crown Coach Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API