Legal Opinion

Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Lauffer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1940No. Civ. 11138PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the above-entitled action for failure of plaintiff to prosecute said action with reasonable diligence.

On August 1, 1928, defendants John Lauffer and Margaret Lauffer executed a note and mortgage in favor of plaintiff, which mortgage contained a power of sale. The note became due and payable on August 1, 1929. On July 27, 1933, plaintiff filed its complaint in the present action seeking the foreclosure of said mortgage and, on the same day, plaintiff recorded a notice of breach and election to sell under the power of sale contained in said mortgage.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnston v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Romero v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Steinbauer v. BondesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Gray v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. Inderbitzen v. Lane HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Woley v. TurkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hatch v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Steen v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Bonelli v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API