Legal Opinion

Market-Front Co. v. Superior Court of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1969No. Civ. 26482PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.

Petitioner seeks mandate requiring the trial court to grant its motion to dismiss a personal injury action in which it is a defendant. We issued alternative writ.

Complaint in the basic action was filed September 21, 1965, only three days before expiration of the one-year statute of limitations. Summons was not served upon petitioner until September 20, 1968, the day before expiration of the three years allowed for such service (Code Civ. Proc., § 581a).

Petitioner-defendant, on October 31, 1968, moved to dismiss the action for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff Taylor, the real party in interest…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Black Bros. Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Bonelli v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Gray v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. Breckenridge v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Simonini v. Jay Dee Leather Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Dunsmuir Masonic Temple v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Gleneagle Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Selma Trailer & Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Woolfson v. Personal Travel Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API