Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shramek

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 2003No. 2002-2180PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, William Shramek of Webster, New York, Attorney Registration No. 0059936, represented a client in a products-liability case in federal district court resulting from the client’s loss of two fingers while operating a decoder. During his representation, respondent failed to timely file an expert *442report, move for an extension of time to file an expert report, respond to the defendant’s motion to strike the expert or prevent him from testifying, or provide evidentiary support for his brief in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Because of respondent’s conduct,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ConnorsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. ConnorsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. FarkasOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Columbus Bar Assn. v. FarkasOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. DiceOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Columbus Bar Assn. v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. WattersonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ShramekOhio Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API