Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Watterson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2007No. 2006-1198PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This court admitted respondent, Tim M. Watterson of Canton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0028264, to the practice of law in Ohio in 1982. On September 22, 2004, we suspended respondent’s license to practice for one year, with six months stayed on conditions, for neglecting a client’s case and charging clearly excessive legal fees. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Watterson, 103 Ohio St.3d 322, 2004-Ohio-4776, 815 N.E.2d 386. In that case, we found that respondent “persistently missed deadlines and otherwise obstructed the process in order to defend against the disciplinary charges” and that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Leslie v. Ohio Housing Finance AgencyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Blessing v. BlessingOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Columbus Bar Assn. v. FinneranOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. WattersonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ShramekOhio Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Bahan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API