Legal Opinion

In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1438This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(l)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1999-2000 reporting period.

On November 14, 2001, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(B)(1), this court issued to the respondent an order to show cause why the commission’s recommendation should not be…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ShramekOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ShramekOhio Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API