Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Connors

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2002No. 2002-1102PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} In this case, we disbar a previously disciplined attorney who neglected multiple client matters, misappropriated client funds by accepting retainers and failing to refund unearned portions, failed to return client files upon request, lied about his ability to continue representation of a client following his suspension from the practice of law, refused to make restitution to a bank after overdrawing his lawyer’s trust account, and commingled client and personal funds.

{¶ 2} The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline concluded that respondent, John Joseph Connors Jr. of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. DixonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. LinnenOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. ConnorsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. RothermelOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. WinkfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. AultOhio Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API