Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Connors

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2002No. 2001-1102PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 479.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CONNORS. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Connors,

2002-Ohio-6722.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Permanent disbarment—Neglecting multiple client matters—Misappropriating client funds by accepting retainers and failing to refund unearned portions—Failing to return client files upon request—Lying about ability to continue representation of a client following suspension from the practice of law—Refusing to make restitution to a bank after overdrawing trust account—Commingling client…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. DixonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. RothermelOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. WinkfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. AultOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. DeatonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ShramekOhio Supreme Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API