State v. Miley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice. -
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in finding that defendant’s statement to B. J. Grindstaff of the Forsyth County Sheriff’s Department was voluntarily given and that the defendant knowingly waived the right to have an attorney present at the time of making his statement. Defendant does not allege that he was not advised of his constitutional rights and in fact concedes he was. Rather, he argues that he did not fully understand his rights as presented to him because of his age, background and limited education. Defendant fur ther argues that after stating he…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BarnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. GunnisonArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.