Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1983No. 56A83PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Defendants contend that the trial judge erred by admitting into evidence testimony concerning their abandoned attempt to rob merchants at Eastland Mall in Charlotte, North Carolina.

It is well settled in North Carolina that the State cannot offer evidence of other crimes committed by an accused where the only relevancy of such evidence is its tendency to show the defendant’s disposition to commit a crime of the nature of the one for which he is on trial. Accord, State v. Williams, 304 N.C. 394, 284 S.E. 2d 437 (1981); State v. Barfield, 298 N.C. 306, 259 S.E. 2d 510…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. RameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  5. State v. LevanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API