Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1975No. 41PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

Defendant assigns as error the trial judge’s denial of his motion for change of venue or for a jury to be summoned from a county other than Rutherford. Defendant based his motion on the grounds that the prominence of the victim and the inflammatory .publicity contained in the local newspapers would pre vent a fair trial in Rutherford County or by jurors drawn from that county. After considering defendant’s affidavit, the record, and oral arguments of counsel, Judge Martin denied defendant’s motion.

The newspaper accounts upon which defendant depends do not appear to be beyond…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. William H. Fuller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. McCollumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. McKoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. FincherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API