Legal Opinion
State v. Goldberg
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 31, 1964No. 433PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Before pleading to the eight indictments, defendants Goldberg and Lekometros filed eight separate verified written motions to quash the indictments. Each motion alleges in identical words the same ground to quash, except as to the number of the indictment, and this is the allegation:
“These defendants, Dave Louis Goldberg and Steve Lekometros aver that Bill of Indictment Number 8139 in this cause returned by the Grand Jury was, according to their information and belief, obtained upon incompetent evidence, to wit: hearsay testimony of W. S. Hunt, Jr., Agent of the State Bureau of Investigation,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. KrulewitchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. . WhitesideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.