Legal Opinion

State v. Barnett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1983No. 23A81PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

In this appeal defendants’ numerous assignments of error relate primarily to the joinder of their cases for trial, the failure to suppress certain testimony, the admission of testimony, instructions to the jury, and denial of their motions to set the verdicts aside and for new trials. We find no merit in any of the assignments and affirm the judgments.

The state’s evidence tends to show:

Early in the morning of 13 August 1980 Chalmers H. (Butch) Wallace was working on the third shift as a clerk at a Fast Fare store on Nations Ford Road in Charlotte. Shortly after 2 a.m. Cheryl…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API