State v. Gray
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
For at least one hundred forty years, long before the insertion of the Fourteenth Amendment into the Constitution of the United States, it has been the well settled law in this State that when one is on trial for an alleged criminal offense, a confession or admission by him may not be admitted in evidence, over his objection, unless it was made voluntarily and understanding^, not induced through use by the police of “the slightest emotions of hope or fear.” It was so held in State v. Roberts, 12 N.C. 259. This Court has consistently followed and applied this basic principle since that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. WhittemoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1827
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by194 opinions
- State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.