People v. Portnoy
Criminal Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jo Ann Ferdinand, J.
Defendant is charged with four counts of aggravated harassment in violation of Penal Law § 240.30 (1) predicated on his *61making four telephone calls. He moves to dismiss the accusatory instrument as defective pursuant to CPL 170.30 (1) (a) and 170.35 (1) (a). For the reasons set forth herein, defendant’s motion is granted and the information dismissed on the grounds that it is insufficient on its face and jurisdictionally defective because it fails to allege any communications by the defendant.
Defendant was arraigned on a misdemeanor complaint on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. MiguezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1990
- People v. MiguezAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1992
- People v. BarhanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1990
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. YablovCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2000
- People v. ShropshireCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1999
- People v. CoyleNassau County District Court · 2000
- People v. RuscianoEastchester Justice Court · 1997
- People v. LiberatoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.