Legal Opinion
People v. Coyle
Nassau County District Court
Decided November 22, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Susan T. Kluewer, J.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss the accusatory instrument is denied.
Defendant stands accused of violating Penal Law § 240.30 (2), aggravated harassment in the second degree, i.e., making a telephone call, whether or not conversation takes place, with *773no purpose of legitimate communication and with the intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm. It is alleged in the factual part of the accusatory instrument that, after being told not to do so, defendant telephoned the complaining witness (a man) four times within one-half hour in an attempt to “get the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. ShackNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. MiguezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1990
- People v. MiguezAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1992
- People v. YablovCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2000
- People v. PortnoyCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. Pierre-LouisNassau County District Court · 2011
- Minus v. LannamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. CruzCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2014
- People v. DohertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. PetersonNassau County District Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.