Legal Opinion
People v. Miguez
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided August 7, 1992PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Judgment of conviction rendered December 12, 1990 affirmed.
Defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of aggravated harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.30 [1]) upon evidence that she made a series of offensive and disparaging telephone calls to the complainant. The People’s proof was strong and persuasive, including evidence of the "trap” placed on the complainant’s telephone, through which the calls were traced to a telephone at the defendant’s residence, and tape recordings of several of the calls. The defendant’s principal argument for reversal on appeal…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People v. AlvinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ElyNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. ShoreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. MiguezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by21 opinions
- Andrew J. Schlagler v. Francis D. Phillips, Ii, District Attorney of Orange CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Vives v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- People v. YablovCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2000
- People v. GoldsteinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2003
- Vives v. The City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.