Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Shropshire

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided May 24, 1999PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

William E. Garnett, J.

The defendant, charged with four counts of aggravated harassment.in the second degree in violation of Penal Law § 240.30 (1) and four counts of aggravated harassment in the second degree in violation of Penal Law § 240.30 (2), seeks to dismiss the charges against her on the ground that the accusatory instrument is facially insufficient. (CPL 170.35.)

Alternatively, the defendant moves to dismiss the charges for failure of the People to have afforded her a speedy trial pursuant to CPL 30.30.

Facial Sufficiency

Is information left by a defendant with a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. YablovCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2000
  2. People v. CoyleNassau County District Court · 2000
  3. People v. HernandezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2005
  4. People v. SquiresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. People v. ThompsonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API