Legal Opinion

People v. Alejandro

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1987PublishedCited by 546 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hancock, Jr., J.

Defendant was charged with resisting arrest (Penal Law § 205.30), tried before a jury and convicted on the basis of a misdemeanor information which set forth no factual allegations establishing that the police officer was effecting an authorized arrest. The information was insufficient, on its face because it lacked the necessary nonhearsay allegations which *135would establish, "if true, every element of the offense charged and the defendant’s commission thereof’ (CPL 100.40 [1] [c]; 100.15 [3]). We hold that this omission constituted a jurisdictional defect…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. IannoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by546 opinions

  1. Weyant v. OkstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Weyant v. OkstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. KalinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. People v. KoniecznyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

541 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API