Legal Opinion

Rawlins Ex Rel. Rawlins v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 12, 1971No. 46,030PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Foth, C.:

The basic issue presented in this appeal is whether an insurance carrier which has issued a policy containing an uninsured motorist clause may, by timely motion, intervene as of right as a party defendant in an action brought by its insured against an uninsured motorist. There are other issues the parties seek to have determined, but for reasons to be discussed we do not deem them ripe for decision on this record.

The details of the automobile collision out of which this action arose are not important to the decision in this case. Suffice it to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Boughton v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Heisner v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. Forrester Ex Rel. Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API