Legal Opinion

Forrester Ex Rel. Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1973No. 47,036PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion o£ the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

This is an action, to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff stemming from a collision of two automobiles. Recovery is sought under the uninsured motorist coverage of a policy of automobile insurance issued by defendant to Raymond Noel.

The issue is whether the uninsured motorist coverage provided in the policy contravenes or otherwise affords less insurance protection than that required by K. S. A. 1972 Supp. 40-284.

The material facts were stipulated by the parties at pretrial conference. Raymond Noel was the father of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hinkel Ex Rel. HinkelNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Doxtater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Spencer v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. DeWitt v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  5. Clark v. Regent Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API