Legal Opinion

Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 29, 1998No. 97SC587PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals’ ruling in Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 948 P.2d 63 (Colo.App.1997) concerning the operation of a consent to sue clause and an arbitration clause in the uninsured motorist provisions of an insurance contract. Specifically we address: (1) whether an insurer could enforce an arbitration clause relating to uninsured motorist coverage after the insured has already obtained a judgment against the uninsured motorist in an action of which the insurer had notice, but to which the insurer did not consent, and (2) whether…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. NissenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Boughton v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Lincoln General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. DeHerrera Ex Rel. DeHerrera v. Sentry Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. Lane v. UrgitusSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  4. Fisher v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Fisher v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API