Baart v. Martin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeals by defendants John Carl and Josephine Carl, and intervenor, Clarence H. Deane, from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Brooks, J., denying their separate motions to amend and make new findings of fact and strike out and add conclusions of law, or for a new trial.
Read the full summary
Appeals by defendants John Carl and Josephine Carl, and intervenor, Clarence H. Deane, from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Brooks, J., denying their separate motions to amend and make new findings of fact and strike out and add conclusions of law, or for a new trial. On September 37, 1897, Katherine Martin and Michael Martin made their promissory note, whereby they promised to pay to Casper Ernst, or order, $1,850, on September 37, 1900. To secure the payment of this note, the Martins executed and delivered to Ernst a first mortgage on lot 1, block 4, in Morrison’s…
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
(after stating the facts as above.)
The appellant Deane makes numerous assignments of. error, and four of them are also assigned on behalf of the appellants Carl. The intervenor questions the correctness of the conclusions of law, and especially of the findings of fact: (1) That Carl had notice of the rights of Baart before the summons in the foreclosure.suit was served upon him; (2) that Baart had no notice of the registration proceedings; (3) that the Title Insurance & Trust Company and the intervenor, Deane, had notice of the fraud by which the registration of the title was .secured; and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Turner v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- State ex rel. Douglas v. WestfallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Hantzch v. MassoltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- State v. BargeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Kozdras v. Land/Vest Properties, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Riley v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Rael v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- State ex rel. Scherber v. Probate Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.