Legal Opinion
Rael v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 25, 1994No. 92SC74PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kirshbaum
In Rael v. Taylor, 832 P.2d 1011 (Colo.App.1991), the court of appeals affirmed a judgment entered by the Costilla County District Court in favor of the respondent, Zachary Taylor, executor of the estate of Jack T. Taylor, Jr.,1 against the petitioners, 100 persons claiming usufructuary rights in a parcel of land consisting of approximately 77,500 acres located in Costilla County, Colorado (the “Mountain Tract”).2 The trial court held, inter alia, that in view of the decision in a federal court Torrens Act proceeding filed by Taylor in 1960 (the 1960 Torrens action), the petitioners’ claims…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Taylor v. JaquezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Graven v. Vail Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Lobato v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Lobato v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Lobato v. TaylorColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.