Riley v. Pearson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
William. C. Riley made application to tbe district court for Ramsey county to register title to certain real estate in block 26, St. Paul proper. In his report the examiner of titles mentioned that the westerly 41.06 feet of lot 8 in that block had been registered and that a certificate from the registrar of titles could be filed in the proceeding, so that all matters in relation to easements and rights growing out of agreements might be settled.
Read the full summary
William. C. Riley made application to tbe district court for Ramsey county to register title to certain real estate in block 26, St. Paul proper. In his report the examiner of titles mentioned that the westerly 41.06 feet of lot 8 in that block had been registered and that a certificate from the registrar of titles could be filed in the proceeding, so that all matters in relation to easements and rights growing out of agreements might be settled. Mary H. Pearson filed her answer, alleging that she was the owner in fee simple of the westerly 41.06 feet of lot 8 and her title had been duly…
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
This is a proceeding under the so-called Torrens act to register the title to land in the city of St. Paul. A trial of the issues resulted in a decision that the applicant was entitled to have his title to the land, and to the easements referred to' in the decision, registered in him. Defendant Mary H. Pearson moved for a new trial, and from an order denying such motion appealed to this court.
The questions presented here relate: . (1) To the character and extent of the easements owned by plaintiff and defendant Daniel Aberle & Sons prior to the decree hereinafter mentioned; (2) to the effect…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Land Co. v. ZeissSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- State ex rel. Douglas v. WestfallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Baart v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Kanne v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. St. Paul Mercury-Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Lobato v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- City of Minneapolis v. CanterburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Rael v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Konantz v. SteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.