State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Writ of certiorari issued from the supreme court to review the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners of Polk county ■ in laying out a drainage ditch m said county désignated as “Ditch No. 23.” The ditch was described in the petition therefor as follows: “A general description of the proposed starting point, route and terminus of said ditch is as follows: Commencing at a point in the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section eight on the northerly shore…
Read the full summary
Writ of certiorari issued from the supreme court to review the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners of Polk county ■ in laying out a drainage ditch m said county désignated as “Ditch No. 23.” The ditch was described in the petition therefor as follows: “A general description of the proposed starting point, route and terminus of said ditch is as follows: Commencing at a point in the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section eight on the northerly shore of a certain lake lying, and being in said section eight and section seventeen, town of Queen, Polk county, Minn.;…
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Certiorari to the board of county commissioners of Polk county to review the proceedings had by them in the matter of laying out a ditch or drain under and pursuant to the provisions of Laws 1901, c. 258.
It appears from the record before us that a petition in due form, dated September 18, 1901, signed by persons whose lands would be affected by thé proposed ditch, was filed in the office of the county auditor of Polk county, praying for the construction of a ditch or drain which was described therein* and extended for a distance of several miles. The petition was in all respects in compliance…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- People Ex Rel. Griffin v. Mayor of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- People v. . BuddNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Head v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State ex rel. Applegate v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Attorney General v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Sisson v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- State ex rel. Patterson v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.