Hammel v. Feigh
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Crow Wing county for a dissolution of partnership, an accounting between the parties and that plaintiff be decreed to be the owner of an undivided one-half interest in certain real estate.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Crow Wing county for a dissolution of partnership, an accounting between the parties and that plaintiff be decreed to be the owner of an undivided one-half interest in certain real estate. The case was tried before Stanton, J., who at the close of the testimony denied defendant’s motion that the jury be directed to return a verdict in his favor and that the jury be directed to answer “No” to the question which follows, and a jury which answered “Yes” to the question: “Were the plaintiff and defendant Thomas Feigh partners as alleged in the complaint with…
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action for a partnership accounting.
The plaintiff, Patrick Hammel, claims that there was a partnership created by oral agreement between himself and the original defendant, Thomas Feigh, who died after the trial, covering certain land on the Cuyuna Eange. The question whether there was such a partnership was submitted to a jury which found that there was. The court made findings for the plaintiff. The administrator of Feigh, J. D. Mahoney, substituted as defendant, appeals from the order denying the motion for a new trial.
1. An agreement by two parties to combine their money and efforts and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wahl v. . BarnumNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- State ex rel. Douglas v. WestfallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- King v. RemingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Irvine v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Baart v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Hartung v. BillmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Thompson v. DuncanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- H. C. Nelson, Sidney A. Nelson, and H. C. Nelson Investment Company v. Seaboard Surety Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Cyrus v. CyrusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Ellingson v. World Amusement Service Assn. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.