Legal Opinion
State v. Dunavant
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1968PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODMAN, J. (Pro Tempore).
The defendant appeals his burglary conviction on the grounds that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress certain evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant and in receiving it in evidence at his trial. The substantial question in this case is whether the magistrate had probable cause to issue a search warrant based on the following affidavit presented to him.
“I, John J. Slcoko, Being first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say,
“That I am a Detective for the City of Portland Police Department assigned to the Burglary Detail.
“That on February 28, 1966,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. SagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- People v. PankyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- State v. McManusOregon Supreme Court · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.