State v. Ingram
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.
The defendant was convicted of having possession of heroin. He appeals solely upon the ground that evidence secured by a search was inadmissible because the affidavit which was the basis for issuing the warrant authorizing the search was insufficient.
We recently held in State v. Dunavant, 250 Or 570, 444 P2d 1 (1968), that the affidavit was defective because the vital statement therein, that the defendant had redeemed stolen green stamp books, was not made upon the personal knowledge of the affiant and the affidavit contained no statement of the source of such information. The affidavit was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- People v. DolginIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. TackerOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. SiemieniecMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. DunavantOregon Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by62 opinions
- State v. GomezIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. SagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. Carter/GrantOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Peterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.