Legal Opinion
State v. Sagner
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 20, 1973PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
Defendants were found guilty of theft in the first degree (ORS 164.055) following a jury trial. Their principal assignment of error on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying their motion to suppress certain evidence. Because of our resolution of that issue, we find it unnecessary to reach the further contention by defendant Rita Sagner that the court erred in denying her motion for a directed verdict.
The pertinent facts relating to the motion to suppress are as follows. On January 12, 1972 a detective for the Portland Police Bureau executed an affidavit in support of his request for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Peter John WeberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- United States v. George Raymond WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. NollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.