Legal Opinion
Berg v. Union State Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 15, 1932No. 28,916PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDiBELL, J.
Action to recover money claimed to have been converted by the defendant. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The case was here before and is reported as Berg v. Union State Bank, 179 Minn. 191, 229 N. W. 102. The facts are stated and considered at length there and abbreviated here.
On the first trial beloAV, reported on appeal in 179 Minn. 191, 229 N. W. 102, the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff. This court held that the direction Avas in error. It said [179…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rodgers v. Bankers National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Agard v. Peoples National Bank of ShakopeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Lindemann v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Berg v. Union State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Cardozo v. FawcettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ohrmann v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Klapmeier v. Telecheck International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Zane v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- James E. Klapmeier v. Telecheck International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973