Legal Opinion

Lindemann v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 1923No. 23,257PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

Action for damages for the killing uf two horses, a cow and a donkey, on defendant’s right of way, and by defendant’s train. The jury found for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

Plaintiff is a farmer. Defendant’s right of way passes through his farm. The right of way is fenced through plaintiff’s farm. At a private crossing, defendant constructed a gate. On the night of October 14, 1921, this gate was open, the animals mentioned strayed through the gate, and on to the railroad track, and were killed by a passing train.

Plaintiff makes two charges of negligence on the part of defendant: First, that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Christenson v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
  2. Vasey v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. Holden v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. Mooers c. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Sather v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Roth v. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  2. Anderson v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. Ohrmann v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Cavallero v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API