Legal Opinion
Berg v. Union State Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 17, 1930No. 27,452PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 229 N.W. 102. Action to recover the proceeds of four county warrants owned by plaintiff and collected by defendant. A verdict was directed by the court in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals from the judgment entered thereon.
Plaintiff purchased the warrants from or through Stevens Company, a bond and brokerage house in Minneapolis, in July, 1921. For brevity Stevens Company will hereafter be referred to as the company. On February 9, 1922, the company notified plaintiff that the county auditor of Richland county, Montana, the county issuing the warrants, was ready to pay…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Union Stock Yards Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- President of the Bank of the Metropolis v. President of the New England BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- President of the Bank of the Metropolis v. President of the New England BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Cady v. South Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Porter v. RosemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Indemnity Co. v. Spring Branch State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Cox v. Metropolitan State Bank, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- First National Bank v. Consolidated School District No. 28Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- The American National Bank of Saint Paul v. National Indemnity Company of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Berg v. Union State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.