Legal Opinion

Agard v. Peoples National Bank of Shakopee

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1927No. 25,577PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action to impress a trust for the benefit of plaintiff upon funds in possession of defendant, Peoples National Bank of Shakopee. After a decision for plaintiff the bank appeals from the judgment.

For many years the late Charles A. Xindbergh was a resident of Little Falls. Apparently he occasionally negotiated and sold farm loans. Plaintiff had purchased one from him. May 2, 1924, the mortgagor called at Mr. Lindbergh’s Little Falls office and left with the person in charge, one Bolander, upwards of $2,000 in payment of the mortgage debt. Note, mortgage and satisfaction, the latter executed by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. President of the Bank of the Metropolis v. President of the New England BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Cady v. South Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hatch v. Fourth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Porter v. RosemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Smith v. Des Moines National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. National Indemnity Co. v. Spring Branch State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Cox v. Metropolitan State Bank, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. First National Bank v. Consolidated School District No. 28Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Berg v. Union State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Berg v. Union State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API