Legal Opinion
Zane v. Home Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 20, 1934No. 29,744PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
Policies insuring plaintiff’s stock of merchandise and fixtures against loss from fire were issued by three companies. A fire having damaged the property insured, plaintiff sued each company. These actions, tried together, resulted in a verdict for the defendants.
For the purposes of the trial it was stipulated that on October 12, 1931, a fire in the Stoffel store, in Pine Island, this state, caused a loss on plaintiff’s merchandise and fixtures therein in the sum of $12,000. At the trial plaintiff admitted that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lindemann v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Bemis Bros. Bag Co. v. NesbittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Vasey v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Marx v. Williamsburgh City Fire Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- O'Connor v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raphtis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. GardenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Weber v. TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INS. CO.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Buffalo Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Dorothy K. Amyx, Agricultural Insurance Company of Watertown, a Corporation v. Dorothy K. Amyx, ætna Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Dorothy K. AmyxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.