Legal Opinion

Ohrmann v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 1947No. 34,308PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Defendant railroad appeals from an order denying its motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

The collision which resulted in plaintiff’s injuries occurred on the main line of the railroad at a crossing at Havana, an unincorporated village about seven and one-half miles west of Owatonna. Havana, which has no depot, consists of six or seven residences, a creamery, a coal shed, and a store. Parallel to the main line of the railroad and about 89 feet to the north is trunk highway No. 14. The crossing in question is that of a graveled county road, running north and south,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Hendrickson v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Haller v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Zenner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Munkel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lee v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Monforton v. Northern Pacific Railway CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Schroht v. VollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Young v. WlazikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Desforge v. City of West St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API