Ohrmann v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Defendant railroad appeals from an order denying its motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.
The collision which resulted in plaintiff’s injuries occurred on the main line of the railroad at a crossing at Havana, an unincorporated village about seven and one-half miles west of Owatonna. Havana, which has no depot, consists of six or seven residences, a creamery, a coal shed, and a store. Parallel to the main line of the railroad and about 89 feet to the north is trunk highway No. 14. The crossing in question is that of a graveled county road, running north and south,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Hendrickson v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Haller v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Zenner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Munkel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lee v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Monforton v. Northern Pacific Railway CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960
- Schroht v. VollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Young v. WlazikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Desforge v. City of West St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.