Legal Opinion

Osborn v. Osborn

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1954No. L. A. 22540PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiff Merinoeth Osborn appeals from an adverse judgment on his complaint to quiet title to certain real property in Los Angeles County, known as Lot 97 of the Casa Verduga Villa Tract. Defendant Louise Osborn, plaintiff’s stepmother, answered and cross-complained to have title to Lot 97 quieted in her. Judgment was entered for plaintiff on the cross-complaint, and defendant Louise Osborn has not appealed therefrom. The other defendants named in the complaint disclaim any interest in the property.

Lot 97 was originally acquired by Merinoeth’s mother, Chloie Osborn, in 1922. Chloie died…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Estate of PieperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Blackburn v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Belshe v. HopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API