Legal Opinion

Moose v. Vesey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 14, 1947No. 34,472PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

Plaintiff, who is the owner of the southeast quarter of section 35, township of Svea, in Kittson county, alleges in his complaint that defendants wantonly and maliciously destroyed his fence, to his damage in the sum of $100, and he requests treble damages. Along the southern boundary of plaintiff’s land, which coincides with the sec tion line and also with the common boundary between Kittson and Marshall counties, is a drainage ditch and road running east and west, which prior to 1910 was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. DurnamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Romann v. BenderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Hoffman v. SilverthornMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Hein v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Blatz v. Allina Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API