Legal Opinion

Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1977No. 47150PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Per curiam

Certiorari to the Minnesota Department of Employment Services (Department). Employer-relator seeks review of the Department’s determination that the claimant-employee was not disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits and that relator’s experience rating account should be charged. We affirm.

In May 1975, Duane J. Plowman (claimant) was discharged by Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd. (relator), a professional accounting corporation. On July 20, 1975, claimant applied for unemployment compensation benefits. On July 29, 1975, relator informed the Department that claimant was terminated for work…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Lumpkin v. North Central Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Johnson v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Moose v. VeseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Kantor v. Honeywell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Khaim Khaimov v. David Crist, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. Group Health Plan, Inc. v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State of Minnesota v. Antoine Rumel LittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API