Legal Opinion

Romann v. Bender

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1934No. 29,537PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 252 N.W. 80. Action to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff in a collision between his automobile and the automobile of the defendant. The defendant counterclaimed for injuries sustained by himself and damages to his auto in the collision. The plaintiff had a verdict for $6,000. The court denied defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, and he appeals. Error in respect of the counterclaim is not pressed.

1. There was no motion to direct a verdict at the close of the testimony. The statute intends such a motion as a condition to a subsequent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Carson v. TurrishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. Lowe v. Armour Packing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Larsen v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. McBride v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Carpenter v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. McKee v. ChaseIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Beckman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Carmody v. AhoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API