State v. . Humphries
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partConnor, J.
Criminal action, tried upon indictment charging the defendant with possession of a slot machine in violation of chapter 282, Public Laws 1935.
The State's evidence tended to show that the defendant was in the possession of a machine or device adapted to be operated by the insertion of a coin in a slot. It was called a marble game or table. By placing a nickel coin in the slot the user or operator was entitled to shoot five balls or marbles, one at a time, by means of a plunger attached to a spring. This causes the balls to roll about over the table under a glass top. If the balls fall in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. . EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Hutchings v. Commercial Bank of DanvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Trust Co. v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. . BroadwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Holmberg v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. . EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.